AN OPTIMIZATION APPROACH TO REFINERY STEAM MANAGEMENT WITH CONSIDERATION OF CO2 EMISSION

Document Type: Research Paper

Author

Research Institute of Petroleum Industry

Abstract

The importance of energy crisis and global warming necessitates presenting strategies in order to decrease the amount of emissions as well as fuel consumption in large and complex industries such as refineries and petrochemical industries. Generally, refinery steam networks are regarded as units which consume fuel enormously. In this paper, the steam network of Tehran Oil Refinery is considered as an industrial case study. Then, various scenarios are proposed to modify the network. In this regard, the network and suggested scenarios are initially modeled into STAR software environment. Next, they are simulated to estimate process parameters and costs. Afterwards, each scenario is separately optimized and, after comparison, the best scenario is chosen from the viewpoint of total annualized cost (TAC). The objective function of optimization is to minimize TAC. At the second stage, the amount of carbon dioxide production is calculated for all the proposed scenarios, before and after optimization. In addition, the tax of production (Kyoto Protocol) is added to the TAC of each scenario. Since in this version of STAR software, the effects of CO2 emission have not been taken into account, a combination of the results of TAC in the software considering CO2 and its effect on TAC has been considered as a new investigation. In fact, both economical and environmental issues are taken into account. Moreover, the scenarios are simultaneously compared with each other and the best scenario is chosen with considering carbon dioxide taxes.

Keywords


      [1]     Smith R., Chemical Process Design and Integration, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2005, 466.

      [2]     Mavromatis S. P., “Conceptual Design and Operation of Industrial Steam Turbines Networks,” Ph.D. Thesis, UMIST, UK, 1996.

      [3]     Mavromatis S. P. and Kokossis A. C., “Chemical Engineering Science, Concep-tual Optimization of Utility Networks for Operational Variations: Part II. Network Development and Optimization,” Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53, 8, 1585-1608.

      [4]     Varbanov P. S., Perry S. J., Makwana Y., Zu X. X., and Smith R., “Top Level Analysis of Utility Systems,” Trans. IChemE, 2004, A82, 784-793.

      [5]     STAR Software, Version 2, Center for Process Integration, School of Chemical Engineering & Analytical Science, Univer-sity of Manchester, UK, 2009.

      [6]     Smith R., Aguilar O., Perry S., and Jin-Kuk K., “Developments in the Design and Opti-mization of Utility Systems,” Trans. IChemE, 2007, A85, 1149-1168.

      [7]     Hydrocarbon Balance, Institute for International Energy Studies (IIES), Techni-cal Report, Islamic Republic of Iran, 2006.

      [8]     Jafari Nasr M. R., Khoshgoftar M. H., Amidpour M., “Reduction of CO2 Emission in Isfehan Crude Oil Refinery with Heat Integration,” presented at 2nd Internation-al Conferences in Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization, The Petroleum Institute, Abu Dhabi, UAE, 2007.

      [9]     Gadalla M., Olujic Z., Jobson M., and Smith R. “Estimation and Reduction of CO2 Emissions from Crude Oil Distillation Units,” Energy, 2007, 22, 132-139.

    [10]    Khodaei J. A. H., “Simulation and Opti-mization of Steam Network in Tehran Oil
Refinery,” M.S. Thesis, K. N. Toosi Univer-sity of Technology and the University of Manchester, UK, 2008
.

    [11]    Khoshgoftar Manesh M. H., Khodaei J. A., H., and Amidpour M., “Optimization of Steam Network in Tehran Oil Refinery (New Scenarios),” presented at 30th Inter-national Conference of Industrial Energy Engineering (IETC), Texas, USA, 2008.

    [12]    Jafari Nasr M. R. and Khodaei J. A. H., “CO2 Reduction through Optimization of Steam Network in Petroleum Refineries: Evalua-tion of New Scenario,” presented at 30th International Conference of Industrial En-ergy Engineering (IETC), Texas, USA, 2008.