Permeability Estimation Using an Integration of Multi-Resolution Graph-based Clustering and Rock Typing Methods in an Iranian Carbonate Reservoir

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Rock typing has been utilized in numerous studies where it has been proven to be a powerful tool  for determining rock properties and estimating unknown parameters such as permeability. It can be performed based on routine core analysis (RCAL) or special core analysis (SCAL) data, and the accuracy of results could be different. Because of the high cost and time-consuming process of special core analysis, SCAL data are not available in all wells of a reservoir. Hence, in this study, a practical workflow is carried out using RCAL data. For this purpose, the data of four wells in a reservoir have been used. After utilizing three HFU (Hydraulic Flow Units), Winland r35 and lithology methods, the results showed that the best and the most accurate rock typing method is Winland r35 method. In the next step, several approaches were used to estimate permeability, and it was observed that the combination of the multi-resolution graph-based clustering (MRGC) method in GEOLOG software and Winland r35 method in this carbonate reservoir is the best estimation approach. The correlation coefficient (R2), between measured and estimated permeability was approximately 0.96. Eventually, when the only available data are the RCAL data, the presented algorithm yields a high degree of accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Aliakbardoust E, Rahimpour-Bonab H (2013) Integration of rock typing methods for carbonate reservoir characterization, Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10: 5.
  2. Chandra, V, Barnett A, Corbett P, Geiger S, Wright P, Steele R, Milroy P (2015) Effective integration of reservoir rock-typing and simulation using near-wellbore upscaling. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 67: 307–326.
  3. Gomes J S, Ribeiro M T, Strohmenger C J, Negahban S, Kalam M Z (2008) Carbonate reservoir rock typing - The link between geology and SCAL, Society of Petroleum Engineers - 13th Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, ADIPEC, 3: 1643–1656.
  4. Kadkhodaie A, Kadkhodaie R (2018) A review of reservoir rock typing methods in carbonate reservoirs: relation between geological, Seismic, and Reservoir Rock Types, Petroleum Engineering Iranian Journal of Oil and Gas Science and Technology, 7, 4: 13–35.
  5. Liu K, Mirzaei-Paiaman A, Liu B, Ostadhassan M (2020) A new model to estimate permeability using mercury injection capillary pressure data: Application to carbonate and shale samples, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 84: 103691.
  6. Mirzaei-Paiaman A, Saboorian-Jooybari H, Pourafshary P (2015) Improved method to identify hydraulic flow units for reservoir characterization, Energy Technology, 3, 7: 726–733.
  7. Mirzaei-Paiaman A, Sabbagh F, Ostadhassan M, Shafiei A, Rezaee R, Saboorian-Jooybari H, Chen Z (2019) A further verification of FZI* and PSRTI: Newly developed petrophysical rock typing indices, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 175: 693–705.
  8. Nabawy B S, Rashed M A, Mansour A S, Afify W S M (2018) Petrophysical and microfacies analysis as a tool for reservoir rock typing and modeling: RudeisFormation, off-shore October Oil Field, Sinai, Marine and Petroleum Geology, 97: 260–276.
  9. Saputelli L, Celma R, Boyd D, Shebl H, Gomes J, Bahrini F (2019) SPE-196704-MS deriving permeability and reservoir rock typing supported with self-organized maps SOM and artificial neural networks ANN - optimal workflow for enabling core-log integration predictive data analytics (PDA ) and machine learning (ML), In SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition. OnePetro.
  10. Turkey S, Al-Kanderi J, Kumar P, Al-Alawi G, Al-Hashmi S, Al-Harthy A, Al-Raisi M (2012) Rock typing and characterization of carbonate reservoirs: A case study from South East Kuwait, In SPE Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, OnePetro.
  11. Rushing J A, Newsham K E, Blasingame T A (2008) Rock typing: keys to understanding productivity in tight gas sands, In: Paper SPE 114164, SPE Unconventional Reservoirs Conference, OnePetro.
  12. Guo G, Diaz M A, Paz F, Smalley J, Waninger E A, Exploration O, Co P (2005) Rock typing as an effective tool for permeability and water-saturation modeling: A case study in a clastic reservoir in the oriente basin, SPE Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 10, 06: 730-739.
  13. Amaefule J O, Altunbay M, Laboratories C, Tiab D, Oklahoma U, Kersey D G, Keelan D K, Laboratories C (1993) Enhanced reservoir description: using core and log data to identify hydraulic (Flow) units and predict permeability in uncored intervals/ wells, In SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, OnePetro.
  14. Mohebian R, Riahi M A, Kadkhodaie A (2017) Characterization of hydraulic flow units from seismic attributes and well data based on a new fuzzy procedure using ANFIS and FCM algorithms, Example from an Iranian carbonate Reservoir, Carbonates Evaporites, 1–10.
  15. Bagheri H, Falahat R (2021) Fracture permeability estimation utilizing conventional well logs and flow zone indicator, Petroleum Research.
  16. Clerke E A (2009) Electrofacies and geological facies for petrophysical rock typing: Khuff C, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE Saudi Arabia Section Technical Symposium.
  17. El Sawy M Z, Abuhagaza A A, Nabawy B S, Lashin A (2020) Rock typing and hydraulic flow units as a successful tool for reservoir characterization of Bentiu-Abu Gabra sequence, Muglad basin, southwest Sudan, Journal of African Earth Sciences, 171: 103961.
  18. Heidari Z, Hamman J G, Day P I, Gorney D L, Alfred D (2011) Assessment of movable gas saturation and rock typing based on the combined simulation of petrophysical borehole measurements, In SPWLA 52nd Annual Logging Symposium, 1–14.
  19. Khadem B, Saberi M R, Eslahati M, Arbab B (2020) Integration of rock physics and seismic inversion for rock typing and flow unit analysis: A case study, Geophysical Prospecting, 68, 5: 1613–1632.
  20. Turkey S, Al-Kanderi J, Kumar P, Al-Alawi G, Al-Hashmi S, Al-Harthy A, Al-Raisi M (2012) Rock typing and characterization of carbonate reservoirs: A case study from South East Kuwait, In SPE Society of Petroleum Engineers - Kuwait International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition, People and Innovative Technologies to Unleash Challenging Hydrocarbon Resources, OnePetro 273–287.
  21. Lucia F J (2007) Carbonate reservoir characterization an integrated approach springer-verlag, Heidelberg. ##
  22. Mirzaei-Paiaman A, Ostadhassan M, Rezaee R, Saboorian-Jooybari H, Chen Z (2018) A new approach in petrophysical rock typing, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 166: 445–464. ##
  23. Kelishami S B A, Mohebian R, (2021) Petrophysical rock typing (PRT) and evaluation of Cenomanian–Santonian lithostratigraphic units in southwest of Iran, Carbonates Evaporites 36: 13. ##
  24. Mirzaei-Paiaman A, Saboorian-Jooybari (2016) A method based on spontaneous imbibition for characterization of pore structure: Application in pre-SCAL sample selection and rock typing, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 35, Part A, 814-825. ##
  25. Mirzaei-Paiaman A, Ghanbarian B (2021) A note on dynamic rock typing and TEM-function for grouping, averaging and assigning relative permeability data to reservoir simulation models, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 87: 103789. ##
  26. Aranibar A, Saneifar M, Heidari Z (2013) Petrophysical rock typing in organic-rich source rocks using well logs, Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, URTC, OnePetro, 1154–1162.
  27. Bize-forest N, Baines V, Boyd A, Moss A, Oliveira R (2014) Carbonate reservoir rock typing and the link between routine core analysis and special core analysts, 8-11. ##
  28. Riazi Z (2018) Application of integrated rock typing and flow unit's identification methods for an Iranian carbonate reservoir, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 160: 483–497. ##
  29. Skalinski M, Kenter J A M (2015) Carbonate petrophysical rock typing: Integrating geological attributes and petrophysical properties while linking with dynamic behaviour, Geological Society Special Publication, 406, 1: 229–259. ##
  30. Kolodzie S (1980) Analysis of pore throat size and use of the Waxman-Smits equation to determine OOIP in Spindle Field, Colorado, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. ##
  31. Ye S J, Rabiller P H (2000) A new tool for electrofacies analysis: multi-resolution graph-based clustering, SPWLA, 41 Annual Logging Symposium, Jun 4-7. ##
  32. Rabiller P (2005) Facies prediction and data modeling for reservoir characterization, 1th Ed. Rabiller Geo-consulting. ##
  33. Shi X, Cui Y (2017) Logging facies classification and permeability evaluation: Multi-Resolution Graph Based Clustering, SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. ##
  34. Mohebian R, Riahi M A, Afjeh M, (2018) Detection of the gas-bearing zone in a carbonate reservoir using multi-class relevance vector machines (RVM): comparisonof its performance with SVM and PNN, Carbonates Evaporites 33: 347–357. ##
  35. Pirrone M, Galli M T, Grilli D, Garofoli L (2019) How machine learning educes intrinsic petrophysical knowledge from legacy data: a case history from a mature field, Offshore Mediterranean Conference and Exhibition, Ravenna, Italy. ##

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics