Assessment of Clustering Methods for Predicting Permeability in a Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Department of Petrophysics, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI)

Abstract

Permeability, the ability of rocks to flow hydrocarbons, is directly determined from core. Due to high cost associated with coring, many techniques have been suggested to predict permeability from the easy-to-obtain and frequent properties of reservoirs such as log derived porosity. This study was carried out to put clustering methods (dynamic clustering (DC), ascending hierarchical clustering (AHC) self organizing map (SOM) and multi-resolution graph-based clustering (MRGC)) into practice in order to predict the permeability of a heterogeneous carbonate reservoir in southwest of Iran. In addition, the results are compared with three conventional approaches, empirical models, regression analysis, and ANN. The performance of all the examined methods was compared in order to choose the best approach for predicting permeability in un-cored wells of the studied field. For all clustering methods, selecting the optimal number of clusters is the most important task. The optimal values for the number of clusters are selected by iteration. The optimal number of clusters for MRGC, SOM, DC, and AHC are 7, 9, 9, and 8 respectively. Empirical equations and regression analysis weakly predict permeability and the value of R2 parameters of both approaches are around 0.6. Generally the performance of clustering techniques is acceptable in Fahliyan formation. These techniques predict permeability between 1 and 1000 mD very well and just overestimate permeability values less than 1 mD. SOM performed the best among all examined techniques (R2=0.7911). The constructed and validated SOM model with 9 clusters was selected to predict permeability in one of un-cored wells of the studied field. In this well, the predicted permeability was in good agreement with MDT derived permeability.

Keywords


[1]. Jennings J. W., and Lucia F. J., “Predicting Permeability From Well Logs in Carbonates With a Link to Geology for Interwell Permeability Mapping”, SPE reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 2003.
[2]. Archie G. E., “The Electrical Resistivity Log as an Aid in Determining Some Reservoir Characteristics”, Petroleum Transactions, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1942.
[3]. Leverett M. C., Capillary Behavior in Porous Solids, Trans, AIME, 1941.
[4]. Tixier M. P., Evaluation of Permeability From Electric-Log Resistivity gradients, Oil and Gas J., 1949.
[5]. Timur A., “An Investigation of Permeability”, Porosity, and Residual Water Saturation Relationships for Sandstone Reservoirs, The Log Analysts, vol. 9, no. 4, 1968.
[6]. Coates G. R., and Dumanoir J.L. A New Approach to Improved Log Derived Permeability, The Log Analyst, 1974.
[7]. Balan B., Mohagheg, S., and Ameri, S. “State of the Art in Permeability Determination from Well Log Data: A Comparative Study, Model Development”, paper SPE 30978 presented at SPE Eastern Regional Conference & Exhibition held in Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.A., 1995.
[8]. Lin J. L., and Salisch H. A., “Determination from Well Logs of Porosity and Permeability in a Heterogeneous Formation”, SPE 28792, presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas conference, Melbourne, Australia, 1994.
[9]. Zhang Y. J., and Lollback P. A., “A Methodology for Estimating Permeability From Well Logs in a Formation of Complex Lithology”, SPE 37025, presented at the SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference, Adelaide, Australia, Oct. 28-31, 1996.
[10]. Cuddy S. J., The Application of the Mathematics of Fuzzy Logic to the Geosciences, SPE Paper 49470, 1998.
[11]. Rabiller P., and Ye S. J., “The iterative use of clustering and modeling to improve permeability prediction”, SPWLA 42th Annual Logging Symposium, 2001.
[12]. Ye S. J., and Rabiller P., “A new tool for electro-facies analysis: multi-resolution graph-based clustering”, SPWLA 41th Annual Logging Symposium, 2000.
[13]. Kohonen T., Self-organizing maps, Third, extended edition, Springer, 501 p, 2001.
[14]. Lukasova A., “Hierarchical agglomerative clustering procedure”, Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 365-381, 1979.
[15]. Lee S. H., and Datta-Gupta A, “Electro-facies Characterization and Permeability Predictions in Carbonate Reservoirs: Role of Multivariate Analysis and Nonparametric Regression”, SPE No. 56658, 1997.
[16]. Mohaghegh S., Balan B., and Ameri S., Permeability Determination from Well Log Data, SPE formation evaluation, 1997.