Application of Quantitative Risk Assessment in Wellbore Stability Analysis of Directional Wells

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Department of Petroleum Engineering, Omidiyeh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Omidiyeh, Iran

Abstract

Wellbore instability has always been one of the challenging issues in the drilling industry, and it could cause a delay in the drilling program, leading to an increase in the cost of the drilling projects. This study utilized data from seven wells to investigate and model directional wells’ stability in a shale formation during drilling in one of the largest oilfields in the southwest of Iran. In this study, two mthods, i.e. (1) mechanical earth model (MEM) and (2) quantitative risk assessment (QRA) are applied to investigate and model directional wells’ stability in shale formation. Herein, a wellbore with full suite log data and compressional and shear wave slowness was selected to construct the mechanical earth model (MEM). Appropriate equations are provided to estimate the field’s static geomechanical data, and laboratory data were used for validation (i.e. core). The minimum mud weight required at azimuth and different angles of the directional well was calculated using numerical and analytical analysis of the wellbore stability using the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. The purpose of the quantitative risk assessment (QRA) phase is to investigate the impact of the uncertainty of key parameters (i.e. input variables of the minimum mud weight equation based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion) and their sensitivity to an increase in success rate and a decrease in failure. In the QRA phase, the Monte Carlo simulation method is used, and the results are displayed on a Tornado diagram. The results of the Hoek-Brown and Mogi-Coulomb failure criteria propose that the sensitivity of the mud density obtained by the above methods to the uncertainty is low. The results maintain that the prediction of the minimum mud weight required for the stability of the investigated wellbore is strongly dependent on changes in the maximum horizontal stress (σ_H) parameter and minimum horizontal stress. Moreover, the internal friction angle and rock adhesion coefficient have the least impact on determining the minimum mud weight needed for wellbore stabilization.

Keywords


  1. Aadnoy SB (2011) Quality assurance of wellbore stability analysis. SPE/IADC Drilling Conference and Exhibition. SPE/IADC 140205,1Amsterdam, Netherlands.##
  2. Chen G (2003) A study of wellbore stability in shales including poroelastic, chemical, and thermal effects, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 38, 3-4: 167-176. ##
  3. Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW (2006) Stability analysis of vertical boreholes using the Mogi–Coulomb failure criterion, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 43, 8: 1200-1211. ##
  4. Nawrocki PA (2010) Critical wellbore pressures using different rock failure criteria. in ISRM International Symposium-6th Asian Rock Mechanics Symposium, International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. ##
  5. Colmenares L. and M. Zoback (2002) A statistical evaluation of intact rock failure criteria constrained by polyaxial test data for five different rocks, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 39, 6:  695-729. ##
  6. Mody FK,  Hale A (1993) Borehole-stability model to couple the mechanics and chemistry of drilling-fluid/shale interactions, Journal of Petroleum Technology, 45, 11: 1093-1101. ##
  7. Gholami R (2014) Practical application of failure criteria in determining safe mud weight windows in drilling operations, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 6,1: 13-25. ##
  8. Li, M., G. Liu, and J. Li (2015)  Thermal effect on wellbore stability during drilling operation with long horizontal section, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 23: 118-126. ##
  9. Zoback, M.D. (2010) Reservoir geomechanics,1st ed., Cambridge University Press,737. ##
  10. Amiri M, Lashkaripour GR, Ghabezloo S, Moghaddas NH, Tajareh MH (2019) Mechanical earth modeling and fault reactivation analysis for CO2-enhanced oil recovery in Gachsaran oil field, south-west of Iran., Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 4: 112-124. ##