Two-Column Sour Water Stripping without Sending Ammonia to The Sulfur Recovery Unit

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

Division of Chemical, Polymer and Petrochemical Technology Development, Research Institue of Petroleum Industry(RIPI), Tehran, Iran

10.22078/jpst.2020.4040.1643

Abstract

In conventional sour water stripping (SWS) in petroleum refineries, H2S and NH3 of the sour water are separated simultaneously at the top of a tray column by sending sour gases to the sulfur recovery unit (SRU). At SRU furnaces, ammonia is oxidized to NOx playing the role of a deactivator for downstream catalytic beds. From an industrial engineering viewpoint, it is proposed to strip ammonia and hydrogen sulfide separately using two stripper columns. The striped ammonia may be incinerated if it is allowed or traded as gaseous or aqueous ammonia. In this study, the two-column sour water stripping approach is implemented for the feed stream of an SWS unit currently working in Iran using a simulation model that was verified based on the design data of an industrial unit. It is concluded that the higher the pressure of the H2S stripper is, the higher the H2S recovery is, and the lower H2S impurity with ammonia stream is. Moreover, preheating of the feed stream and sending a lower portion of cold feed stream as a representative of liquid reflux resulted in increased utility consumption and also changed the amount of water sent with sour gas and ammonia stream. Finally, aqueous ammonia (less than 10% purity) or ammonia vapor stream (about 90% purity) can be traded as a value-added product for this unit.
 

Keywords


  1. Hung J M, Hung Y (2004) Treatment of oilfield and refinery wastes, in handbook of industrial and hazardous wastes treatment, M. Dekker, 174: 235-336.##
  2. Zahid U (2019) Techno-economic evaluation and design development of sour water stripping system in the refineries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 236: 117633. ##
  3. EXXON Company (1999) Water pollution control: sour water strippers, Design Practices, Section XIX-A10: 1-47. ##
  4. Addington L, Fitz C, Lunsford K, Lyddon L, Siwek M (2011) Sour water: where it comes from and how to handle it, GPA Europe Annual Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 12013-12010. ##
  5. Stevens DK, Mosher A (2008) Fundamentals of sour water stripping Brimstone sulfur symposia, Vail, Colorado, United States, 2008. ##
  6. Quinlan M, Hati A (2010) Processing NH3 acid gas in sulphur recovery unit, PhD thesis, Universidade Federal Do Rio De Janeiro Escola De Quimica, 1-116. ##
  7. Bechtel Company (2013) Chevron Wwt process, Bechtel Acquires Chevron’s Waste Water Treatment Technology, https://www.bechtel.com. ##
  8. Morado H, Medeiros J, Araújo O (2019) Emission minimization of a two-stage sour water stripping unit using surrogate models for improving heat duty control, Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems, 7: 305-324. ##
  9. King L J (1990) Novel regenerated solvent extraction processes for the recovery of carboxylic acids or ammonia from aqueous solutions part II. Recovery of ammonia from sour waters, PhD Thesis, University of California, 1-134. ##
  10. Mohammad Taheri M, Taheri Z (2019) Single-tower sour water stripper: NH3 content reduction of sour gas, 5th International Conference on Chemical and Petroleum Engineering. Tehran, Iran. ##
  11. Guerra M J, (2006) Aspen HYSYS Property packages-overview and best practices for optimum simulations, Aspen Process Engineering Webinar. ##